⧼exchistory⧽
5 exercise(s) shown, 0 hidden
Apr 22'25
[math] \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}[/math]

This article was automatically generated from a tex file and may contain conversion errors. If permitted, you may login and edit this article to improve the conversion.

Given a finite dimensional Hopf algebra [math]A[/math], prove that its dual [math]A^*[/math] is a Hopf algebra too, with structural maps as follows:

[[math]] \Delta^t:A^*\otimes A^*\to A^* [[/math]]

[[math]] \varepsilon^t:\mathbb C\to A^* [[/math]]

[[math]] m^t:A^*\to A^*\otimes A^* [[/math]]

[[math]] u^t:A^*\to\mathbb C [[/math]]

[[math]] S^t:A^*\to A^* [[/math]]

Also, check that [math]A[/math] is commutative if and only if [math]A^*[/math] is cocommutative, and also discuss what happens in the cases [math]A=C(G)[/math] and [math]A=C^*(H)[/math], with [math]G,H[/math] being finite groups.

Apr 22'25
[math] \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}[/math]

This article was automatically generated from a tex file and may contain conversion errors. If permitted, you may login and edit this article to improve the conversion.

Prove that the compact quantum groups [math]G[/math] which are finite, in the sense that [math]\dim C(G) \lt \infty[/math], coincide with the discrete quantum groups [math]\Gamma[/math] which are finite, in the sense that [math]\dim C^*(\Gamma) \lt \infty[/math], and coincide as well with the finite quantum groups.

Apr 22'25
[math] \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}[/math]

This article was automatically generated from a tex file and may contain conversion errors. If permitted, you may login and edit this article to improve the conversion.

Clarify the discrete quantum group formulation of the various compact quantum group product operations, namely taking subgroups, quotients, dual free products, free complexifications and projective versions.

Apr 22'25
[math] \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}[/math]

This article was automatically generated from a tex file and may contain conversion errors. If permitted, you may login and edit this article to improve the conversion.

Prove that the free complexification embedding

[[math]] \widetilde{O_N^+}\subset U_N^+ [[/math]]

is an isomorphism at the level of the associated diagonal tori.

Apr 22'25
[math] \newcommand{\mathds}{\mathbb}[/math]

This article was automatically generated from a tex file and may contain conversion errors. If permitted, you may login and edit this article to improve the conversion.

Find the complexification operation [math]O_N\to U_N[/math], by using linear algebra, or Lie algebras, or whatever other means.